Ok =) Next time i'll add bug numbers =) Actualy i simply forgot about them.
2010/8/17 Alex Legler <a...@gentoo.org>: > On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 10:46:10 +0400, Peter Volkov <p...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> В Пнд, 16/08/2010 в 18:04 +0000, Alexey Shvetsov (alexxy) пишет: >> > alexxy 10/08/16 18:04:52 >> > >> > Modified: ChangeLog >> > Added: drupal-5.23.ebuild drupal-6.19.ebuild >> > Removed: drupal-6.16.ebuild drupal-6.17.ebuild >> > drupal-5.22.ebuild >> > Log: >> > [www-apps/drupal] Version bump >> >> Always reference bug number and mention people that spent time >> reporting problems in our bugzilla. Please, add bug # and attribution >> into ChangeLog. Also with version bump it's always good idea to keep >> previous version to allow re-installation of previous versions in the >> case of regressions. >> >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=323399 >> > > That's rather https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=332541 > > I agree that the bug # should be referenced, but as for removing the > old versions, that's something we usually ask people to do after > bumping packages with security issues to minimize the risk of people > installing possibly vulnerable versions. > > -- > Alex Legler | Gentoo Security / Ruby > a...@gentoo.org | a...@jabber.ccc.de > -- Best Regards, Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Russia Department of Molecular and Radiation Biophysics Gentoo Team Ru Gentoo Linux Dev mailto:alexx...@gmail.com mailto:ale...@gentoo.org mailto:ale...@omrb.pnpi.spb.ru
