On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:57:46 -0500 Nathan Zachary <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't think that the documentation changes should be a determining > factor in switching to OpenRC. If we are going to endorse using OpenRC, > the more relevant issues are the ones regarding its future development. > The documentation can be updated in due time. Of course, that's just my > opinion.
It's not really a determining factor in whether or not we adopt it as our default system. It's just one of the big tasks to complete if we do. I'm not arguing against using OpenRC just because the docs will require significant rewrites.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
