On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 10:39:59 +0200 Dirkjan Ochtman <d...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:32, Robin H. Johnson <robb...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > After a discussion on IRC, a few of us were considering the value of > > adding suggestions on handling of bugs in Bugzilla from a developer (and > > editbugs user) perspective. > > Good idea, I've been confused about the interaction models here. > > > 1. General case > > - You should only close bugs that you are assigned or if you (or an alias > > you represent) just fixed them. Prefix "Once assigned,". Can we add a point about bug-wranglers not messing with bugs after they've been assigned? I've had someone closing bugs filed directly from a dev to my herd because they didn't include emerge --info. > > - If you fix a bug and AREN'T already getting mail for it, you should > > add yourself to the CC list, to listen for regressions or responses > > to TESTREQUEST. > > Only add arches to stabilization requests if you're a maintainer? No. If the maintainer doesn't respond in a reasonable amount of time then I'm adding arches myself. If this weren't allowed then the GCC stabilization bugs would take approx 8 years to fix. -- fonts, gcc-porting, we hold our breath, we spin around the world toolchain, wxwidgets you and me cling to the outside of the earth @ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
