Hi Alexis, > you did it the correct way but that's what happens when you're alone in a > team and are moving without reliable internet connection then emails & > other stuff start to pile up :/
I'm sorry, I did not want to be pushy in any way... :| > > * dev-tex/achemso(-1.0) should be masked and then removed, since > > texlive-2009 contains already version 3.3. > > Feel free to last rite it; or better: step up as a maintainer and bump it > so that you'll be sure to always have the greatest version and don't > depend on texlive's yearly releases :) Lastrite is probably better in this case. Not much has changed recently and texlive is current afaik. > (and even better: join tex herd if you're interested in doing such bumps) Done, also [email protected]. (Gimme more Bugzilla mails...) :) > > * I'd like to move dev-tex/revtex-4.1_p2 and its dependency dev- > > tex/natbib-8.31a from the sci overlay > > Would it be OK with you if I do any of this? > > yes though if its in texlive I usually want to remove them from the > texlive's bundle I see the separate ebuilds more as a temporary workaround for the few really needing bleeding edge... and will happily remove them again when texlive-2011 is out. The natbib ebuild might even become obsolete with texlive-2010 already, have not checked yet. I think most people will be happy with the texlive version, so we should keep it for simplicity. Thanks for the tips with the ebuilds; I'll go ahead in the next days. Best, Andreas -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer [email protected] http://www.akhuettel.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
