On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 01:47:57 -0600
Ryan Hill <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 17:35:18 +1300
> Alistair Bush <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > > > We don't do revbumps on masked toolchain packages.
> > > 
> > > Why not?
> > 
> > Yeah why not?  do you inform users of this?
> 
> Users unmasking toolchain packages need to be paying close attention
> to what's going on behind the scenes.  They're in the tree for people
> who know what they're doing to test.  Even unmasked, toolchain
> revbumps are expensive and we do them only when absolutely necessary.

I think users would appreciate it if you mentioned that in the mask
message. Just for the future.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to