2010-11-29 02:54:14 Jonathan Callen napisał(a):
> Just throwing this out as an option, instead of using "<< >>", maybe "{
> }", which might be more readable (and isn't currently allowed at all in
> *DEPEND.
I'm not sure if Thomas Sachau or somebody else wasn't planning to use "{...}"
in the future.
--
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
