On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 21:42:32 +0100 Enrico Weigelt <[email protected]> wrote:
> The main problem IMHO is that portage doesn't record which libraries > some package links in, so it doesn't know which ones have to be > protected from unmerge (unless explicitly stated somewhere). > So I'd propose to add record that information. On next merge, > this information can be used for an automatic library-protect. > This would also record which libraries have been protected from > removal and for whom. Subsequent merges will update this that, > and once all importers have been unmerged, depclean can clean > up the leftover dirt. > > What do you think about this idea ? You mean what do we think about portage-2.2 and preserved-libs? -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
