On 01/17/2011 08:10 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 13:49 Sun 16 Jan , Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> Does anyone care to justify their "block the old name" habits? > > How about playing nicely with overlays where the moves didn't happen > (yet)?
That seems like a somewhat justifiable use case. If such a blocker is placed in RDEPEND and specifies the SLOT (if the package happens to be slotted), then it shouldn't cause a problem. Even if the package move gets applied to the blocker, it will be obvious that a slotted circular blocker in RDEPEND should simply be ignored. -- Thanks, Zac
