On 21:56 Fri 21 Jan     , Sebastian Pipping wrote:
> On 01/21/11 21:35, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > gentoo-portage.git [2]
> > gentoo-portage-historical.git [2]
> > 
> > [..]
> > 
> > [2] This is an idea where I'd like to place the main tree, and the
> >     additional graftable tree with the full history. I'm not entirely
> >     happy with this location, and WELCOME suggestions to improve it.
> 
> I would prefer something like "gentoo-main" or "main-tree" over
> "gentoo-portage" as could would help reducing the problem of mixing up
> our main tree and one of our package managers.  If it actually is the
> main tree, why not put that in the name.  Thanks for consideration.

Sweet, we actually got an invitation to bikeshed! Here's my contributions:

gentoo-tree.git
gentoo-portage-tree.git
portage-tree.git
  (the name 'portage' derives from bsd ports, so it makes sense to keep
   that connection to make it recognizable to that audience)

-- 
Thanks,
Donnie

Donnie Berkholz
Sr. Developer, Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dberkholz.com

Attachment: pgp6knDsYSf2N.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to