* Markos Chandras <[email protected]> schrieb: > My suggestion, as I said to fosdem, is to freeze, or take a > snapshot if you like, of the current tree, stabilize what you > need to stabilize, test the whole tree ( at least compile wise ) > for a couple of weeks and then replace the existing stable tree.
hmm, would it make sense to add a new masking for the testing tree, so users could decide which stability grade vs they wish ? or perhaps use overlays for that ? For example, I'd like to have the critical packages (everything that's needed to bootup and do basic remote maintenance) from the new frozen-stable tree, but other things should stay as they are. cu -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ phone: +49 36207 519931 email: [email protected] mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme ----------------------------------------------------------------------
