On Seg, 2011-04-11 at 17:33 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 04/11/2011 03:01 AM, Iain Buchanan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Since I posted about looking for help[1] I'm sad to say I've barely > > touched SynCE. Family commitments have changed, and I'm studying again > > for the degree I started 10 years ago! > > > > I'm therefore asking to be removed as the proxy for Synce. Hopefully > > this means it won't die in Gentoo :) > > > > Massive thanks to everyone who helped with my bad ebuild programming and > > testing along the way - volker, mescalinum, ssuominen, the SynCE team > > and everyone else. > > > > The original testing overlay remains here[2] for anyone who wants to > > take it over, just contact the SynCE dev team. > > > > If there are any questions please cc me directly as I may not be on the > > -dev list much more. > > > > [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/69230 > > [2] https://synce.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/synce/dist/gentoo > > > > many thanks! > > np > > We should have all of SynCE in Portage again, except for the GNOME bits > like synce-trayicon (hardcoded depend on sys-apps/hal) and the KDE bits > (haven't even looked). > > Just by pulling synce-sync-engine as well as synce-connector the deps > should get pulled in -> No need for a meta package. > > The overlay was, when I last checked entirely uncompatible with the > packages in tree as well as has confusing amount of deprecated ebuilds. > I would love if someone could wipe it clean so people stop accidentally > shooting themself in the foot with it. > > I'll add the synce-trayicon to tree soon as upstream produces a HAL-free > version of it... > > And it's up the KDE team to add the KDE bits if they want. >
Hello, I want to help in sanitizing the overlay and bring the ebuilds into portage. We can see that next weekend if you have the time. Regards, -- Angelo Arrifano (miknix) Developer / GPE maintainer http://www.gentoo.org/~miknix http://miknix.homelinux.com
