On Tuesday 17 May 2011 20:28:56 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Peter Volkov <[email protected]> wrote: > > В Втр, 17/05/2011 в 11:57 -0500, William Hubbs пишет: > >> I think we should support the /run directory [1] [2]. > >> > >> I, as well as several others, believe we should proactively create this > >> directory ... What does everyone else think? > > > > I've read https://lwn.net/Articles/436012/ and that convinced me. Until > > there is better solution, please, do it. Also I think it's good idea if > > it'll be on tmpfs, as it should, from the very beginning. > > I'd add that if we want /run to be on tmpfs, /var/run and /tmp should > both be on tmpfs by default. I've been doing this manually for a year, > and so have other distributions.
The lwn article is definitely interesting to read, I welcome the new /run. I wouldn't make /tmp as tmpfs though, there are some packages (wireshask I'm looking at you) that can fill the directory fairly easy. Regards, -- Angelo Arrifano AKA MiKNiX Gentoo Embedded developer GPE maintainer http://www.gentoo.org/~miknix http://miknix.homelinux.com
