On 5/20/11 6:54 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
On Friday 20 May 2011 04:58:12 Luca Barbato wrote:On 5/17/11 6:57 PM, William Hubbs wrote: That shouldn't be read as endorsing the peculiar and conceptually broken init replacement called systemd.luJust curious, would you mind elaborating on it's peculiarities and conceptual brokenness?
Having sockets managed by init instead of your daemon doesn't work quite well. (see why xinetd isn't used in many real-life situations)
lu
