On Tue, 31 May 2011 15:33:22 +0200 Krzysztof Pawlik <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 31/05/11 15:28, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > > On Tue, 31 May 2011 11:00:27 +0100 > > Markos Chandras <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >> Hash: SHA512 > >> > >> On 30/05/2011 12:39 μμ, Jeroen Roovers (jer) wrote: > >>> jer 11/05/30 11:39:21 > >>> > >>> Removed: acct.initd-r1 acct.logrotate-r1 > >>> Log: > >>> Move to stable since there was no functional difference anyway. > >>> > >>> (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha37/cvs/Linux x86_64) > >>> > >> > >> Hi Jer, > >> > >> I've noticed you did not update the ChangeLog in this commit. The > >> new policy[1] requires to update the ChangeLog on every commit no > >> matter how important or trivial it is. Please keep that in mind on > >> your future commits. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> [1]:http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/misc-files/changelog/index.html > > > > You are joking right? > > Nope, check out thread 'Council May Summary: Changes to ChangeLog > handling' (archives.g.o seems to be missing the whole thread). > So the ChangeLog should say: <date> <perpetrator> -files/somefile-r1: Remove files/somefile-r1. Right? This is getting ridiculous. jer PS: I am coming back from a busy extended weekend at work, people have been filing lots of bug reports (there's a wranglers' queue of more than a hundred now, most of which haven't been touched in days), version bumps, stabilisation requests for HPPA, a missing Gentoo developer to seek out and see if he's still OK, a private life to update if I still have one, and instead I get to answer this ridiculous nit picking crowd over yet another technical detail in this QA debacle? Nice.
