On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto <jmbsvice...@gentoo.org> wrote: > To be clear I support the goal to move our tree to git. > However, I'd like to point out that simply moving to git will leave us > in the same state. Assuming everyone agrees that git is far more useful > than cvs to check for changes in the tree, a simple but important issue > remains: the plan is to move the "development tree" to git, but to keep > the rsync mirrors for users. So the "move to git" doesn't fix the issue > for users or developers using an rsync tree.
Temporarily or permanently? One of the huge benefits in using git would be really fast emerge --syncs. Not having some kind of system for migrating users to git seems like a lot of the benefits are lost. Matt
