On 06/08/11 11:43, Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:28:47 +0200 > Dirkjan Ochtman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:27, Patrick Lauer <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> In all cases I want one resource to look at, viewcvs is a horrible >>> and slow interface. So it does make sense to keep changelogs filled >>> with information - maybe automation is needed, I don't have a >>> strong opinion either way. But don't make me do more work because >>> you are lazy, that never ends well. >> >> IMO we should just make repoman commit update the ChangeLog. > > What if we wanted to remove ChangeLogs then for autogeneration? Will we > require all devs to quickly update their portage versions? >
Just make committing the ChangeLog fatal on the server side ;) There are enough ways to get it done ... -- Patrick Lauer http://service.gentooexperimental.org Gentoo Council Member and Evangelist Part of Gentoo Benchmarks, Forensics, PostgreSQL, KDE herds
