On Friday, June 17, 2011 14:39:22 Kacper Kowalik wrote:
> W dniu 17.06.2011 18:41, Mike Frysinger pisze:
> > On Friday, June 17, 2011 05:01:10 Kacper Kowalik wrote:
> >> W dniu 17.06.2011 05:03, Mike Frysinger pisze:
> >>>> DEPEND="virtual/fortran"
> >>>>
> >>>>> RDEPEND="${DEPEND}"
> >>>
> >>> i'm not sure that RDEPEND is correct. do all fortran compilers
> >>> additionally require the fortran compiler to be available at runtime ?
> >>
> >> They require fortran runtime library if they don't link it statically.
> >
> > *if* there is a fortran runtime library in the first place. gcc provides
> > one, but does that mean all fortran compilers do ?
>
> It *really* makes things easier if virtual/fortran is in RDEPEND. Is it
> serious obstacle?i didnt say it was an obstacle. i asked if it's actually correct. atm, it would seem it is required. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
