On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 08:38:38AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 30 Jun 2011, William Hubbs wrote: > > > Please discuss. Did I leave out any steps? Are there any points I > > have left out besides the time window between steps 2 and 3? Should > > there be a time window before removing baselayout-1? What about > > between steps 1 and 2? What do you consider to be a reasonable time > > window before we stop supporting migration from baselayout-1 to > > baselayout-2/openrc? I'm thinking on the order of a few months, but > > not years. > > We have a policy on this, see > <http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20091109-summary.txt>: > > | Upgrade path for old systems > | ---------------------------- > | Vote (unanimous): The ebuild tree must provide an upgrade path to a > | stable system that hasn't been updated for one year. > > So the time window should be at least one year after stabilisation of > baselayout-2 and openrc.
To clarify then, we can do everything except remove the migration code from the openrc ebuilds. That step needs to wait until 28 Jun 2012 right? William
pgpLF4mqYSCei.pgp
Description: PGP signature
