On 06.07.2011 21:55, William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > from my previous discussion, I am about to put a new virtual in the > tree. Do I need to use the same ~arch/30 day wait/stabilize cycle I > would normally use even though the default package the virtual will > bring in is stable everywhere? > > I'm thinking I can take the virtual straight to stable in this situation,, > but I want to be sure. >
Nothing stable should be using the virtual at the time of commit so what's the benefit of going stable fast? Repoman should also be preventing commits straight to stable. I would stable the virtual at the same time as someone stable starts to use it (which probably means the 30 day period). Regards, Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
