-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:59:29 +0300 Markos Chandras <[email protected]> wrote: > >> # Markos Chandras <[email protected]> (10 Jul 2011) > >> # Dead upstream. Bugs #353788 and #348232 > >> # Alternatives: > >> # net-misc/dibbler > >> # net-misc/dhcp[ipv6] > >> # Masked for removal in 30 days > >> net-misc/dhcpv6 > > > > Not cool. For a few reasons: > > > > 1. I had to delete significant sections of the ipv6 guide tonight, > > since there's no documentation for these alternatives. Now there's > > nothing on running an ipv6 dhcp server or client. > > Which documentation are you referring to?
Sorry; meant to include the URI: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/ipv6.xml > dhcpv6 has no stable keywords Really? I thought it did. Then that's something the GDP should have noticed when we initially added that section to the guide. > True. I was to request stabilization as well. Thanks. > I can keep this package in the tree long enough until there is an > alternative documentation available. My point is not to frustrate > users but to "force" them migrate to better alternatives. Moreover, > remember that the dhcpv6 upstream is dead and dhcp[ipv6] is the > official alternative. I don't quite see the point in supporting > dhcpv6 anymore. I don't like the idea of keeping a dead package around, either. My main issue is that there's no documentation on using ipv6 configs with net-misc/dhcp, so I have nothing to add to the guide. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk4g0A8ACgkQxPWMzpKk6kO19wCbBQBO9iJlWguLcysqTb5ULLv1 DK4AnjVRCrOWE3eHSuBnPtUOuWmZgCKR =UTmL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
