On 08/11/2011 12:13 AM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: > 1. implement the ASAP feature in Entropy and live with broken dependencies > 2. live with broken dependencies > 3. Fix the broken dependencies > 4. Fix the broken dependencies and have PMS defining rules for > scheduling PDEPENDs.
It's fair enough for you to call them "broken" dependencies. However, when writing "broken" dependencies it what comes natural to ebuild developers, is it practical to fight them even though you can write your dependency resolver to cope with it? -- Thanks, Zac
