-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/07/2011 05:27, Michał Górny wrote:

> On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:17:21 +0300 Alexey Shvetsov <ale...@gentoo.org>

> wrote:

> 

>> Moving things as openrc to /usr/libexec will effectevely barake old 

>> systems with separtae / and /usr. So it isnt good idea

> 

> Old systems should migrate to initramfs, like it was already pointed out

> before. Breakage is already there, you just don't notice it.

> 








I've used a separate /usr on every system I've ever built on Gentoo, and
some have filesystems going back years.  Never once have I had any issues
with separate / and /usr, and none of them use an initramfs.  Our own
security guide has made this recommendation for as long as I can remember
(so one can mark /usr as read-only on production setups, for example).

As far as initramfs, is this something that would need to go into the
kernel?  I hand-build all of my kernels, so any such initramfs package might
be better off as a standalone package available on the FS at kernel build
time.  I also netboot some of my systems, and they have limits on the total
size of the kernel image (7.2MB on one, ~40MB on another, etc), hence the
need to keep this small or find another way to do things.

Are there possibilities about breaking off just a small piece of openrc and
putting that into /run (or /boot)?  Enough of the core scripts so that it
can find /usr and mount it before continuing?


- -- 
Joshua Kinard
Gentoo/MIPS
ku...@gentoo.org
4096R/D25D95E3 2011-03-28

"The past tempts us, the present confuses us, the future frightens us.  And
our lives slip away, moment by moment, lost in that vast, terrible in-between."

- --Emperor Turhan, Centauri Republic
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
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=Y0sh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to