Markos Chandras posted on Fri, 16 Sep 2011 21:25:07 +0300 as excerpted:
>> that would be ideal, and drop "amd64" in the process: x86/x86_64/
>> -mike
>
> Ok so we will probably have the following multilib options
>
> * x86(ABI=x86_32{/lib}) + amd64(ABI=x86_64{lib64/}) +
> x32(ABI=x32{/libx32})
> * x86/amd64 ( what we already have in amd64 multilib )
This one would probably be x86/x86_64 , as Mike said drop amd64.
(Tho I much prefer amd64, or if it's changed, something else without a _,
which is hard to type, at least on the US/qwerty layout, requiring both
hands to get the shift, and two rows up plus over to get the _, amd64
works quite nicely in that regard.)
> * x86/x32
>
> and
>
> * x86 (no multilib for 32-bit processors ) ( what we already have in x86
> profile )
Don't forget current amd64/no-multilib. I guess that's be
* x86/x86_64/no-multilb
(Tho again, I'd prefer keeping amd64, for x86/amd64/no-multilib.)
And presumably there's also be
* x86/x32/no-multilib
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
