On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 03:28:48 -0700 Brian Harring <[email protected]> wrote: > Paludis wise, it's eapi2 indirictely due to boost and eselect. > Looking at the eapi depgraph for that, doesn't look particularly > viable for upgrading from a EAPI<2 manager for paludis. I'll leave > it to Ciaran to comment on the feasability of a static rescue > binary (or extremely simplified upgrade pathway).
boost's just for Python bindings, which are optional. The eselect dependency is hard, and can't easily be made optional, so ideally eselect should stick with older EAPIs. Maybe we should stick something in metadata.xml... -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
