On 11-10-2011 21:01:40 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 10/11/2011 08:05 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > On 11-10-2011 19:59:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> >> So I've missed one ${EPREFIX} for docdir= ? How about just fixing that,
> >> and not crapping all over the package?
> >
> > How about first asking the maintainer before you completely rewrite an
> > ebuild? I'm not innocent on this topic either (ask Diego for example),
> > and I do allow you to make a lot of changes to my packages. Just don't
> > force your style and preferences on me.
>
> So basically you are saying you reverted tehnically correct changes for
> cosmetics. What ticked you off, the \ lines changes? I believe that was
> the only change that wasn't about fixing something broken.No, you broke the package for Prefix. Next you bumped it to EAPI=4, then you removed SRC_URI for no particular reason, dropped libtool files and dropped static archives. Next to this you did some reordering and other cosmetic changes. > And so have you, changed dozens of my ebuilds for PREFIX compability or > other random fixes, not everything turned out correct, mistakes were > made and were clearly accidental. I've fixed them instead of wasting > both of our times. Is it too much to ask for same in return? I already told you that you can change quite a lot to my ebuilds, without me complaining. Do you mind me reverting your stuff and redoing it now? -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
