On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 08:09:21 +0100 Markos Chandras <hwoar...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 10/11/11 04:00, Ryan Hill wrote: > > On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 18:33:15 +0300 Samuli Suominen > > <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > >> It's not like fastened lastriting hasn't happened before. I > >> question your motives in picking this particular one. It's not > >> like I expected cookies for the time I've put into this porting > >> effort, but not this "attack" either. > > > > Then stop trying to remove packages that have an active maintainer. > > I could have sworn that was written down somewhere. > > > > > Isn't this the same situation with gcc stabilizations? Once the > timeframe for fixing broken packages with e.g gcc-4.5 is passed, the > remaining broken packages will be gone. Absolutely not. They aren't even masked. There are usually a few niche packages that can't be fixed but are in use. People can switch to a previous version if they ever have to rebuild them. -- fonts, gcc-porting, it makes no sense how it makes no sense toolchain, wxwidgets but i'll take it free anytime @ gentoo.org EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
