On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:13:11 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 12:23:07 +0200 > Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <[email protected]> wrote: > > So qutecom is not broken and needs not be removed as long as > > <linux-headers-2.6.38 is in the tree. > > Dependencies using <, <=, =, ~ or =* are broken, except in certain > special situations inside ||. So, in your opinion, if we have 'foo' and 'libfoo' which are strictly version-bound, we can't allow users to install older versions? -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
