On Sunday 30 October 2011 18:33:51 Petteri Räty wrote: > On 27.10.2011 2.40, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i can't see any ebuild/eclass using egethome, egetshell, > > is-login-disabled from portability.eclass. anyone have a reason for > > keeping these before i punt them ? > > Breaking overlays. Isn't the standing policy still to not break > backwards compatibility as long as an eclass exists?
do you have any actual examples ? -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
