On 11/14/2011 3:03 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 14 November 2011 14:00:01 Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On 11/13/2011 11:37 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> On Sunday 13 November 2011 16:42:39 Mike Gilbert wrote: >>>> If I understand you correctly, you are just going to add a "cxx" use >>>> flag to gcc for some transitional period? If so, I can simply switch it >>>> at some point after you add the new flag? >>> >>> transition period: >>> http://sources.gentoo.org/www-client/google-chrome/google-chrome-17.0.932 >>> .0_alpha108826.ebuild?r1=1.1&r2=1.2 >>> >>> eventually you can drop the [-nocxx] dep, but it'll prob be a while. >> >> Why do I need the [-nocxx] dep at this point? Everybody is going to end >> up rebuilding gcc with the new use flag anyway. > > some people might, but not everyone. if we remove the [-nocxx], and someone > where to run `emerge google-chrome -u`, portage would fail with dependency > errors.
Actually, it pulls in gcc[cxx], and rebuilds gcc. There is no dependency error. We can prevent an unnecessary gcc rebuild by listing [-nocxx] first however, so I committed that.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
