On Wednesday 23 November 2011 19:31:11 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> currently we blacklist certain phases (which is largely based on EAPI=0 and
> blocking src_*) for enew{user,group}.  moving forward, ferringb suggested
> we invert this into a whitelist of allowed phases.
> 
> afaict, the blacklisting + dev documentation has done a good job of
> restricting calls to three places: pkg_{setup,preinst,postinst}.  so
> inverting the logic should largely be safe.  on the off chance it isn't, i
> think letting the ebuild `die` and getting it fixed up via bug reports is
> acceptable (i grepped through the tree a bit and looked sane).

committed:
http://sources.gentoo.org/eclass/user.eclass?r1=1.10&r2=1.11
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to