On Wednesday 23 November 2011 19:31:11 Mike Frysinger wrote: > currently we blacklist certain phases (which is largely based on EAPI=0 and > blocking src_*) for enew{user,group}. moving forward, ferringb suggested > we invert this into a whitelist of allowed phases. > > afaict, the blacklisting + dev documentation has done a good job of > restricting calls to three places: pkg_{setup,preinst,postinst}. so > inverting the logic should largely be safe. on the off chance it isn't, i > think letting the ebuild `die` and getting it fixed up via bug reports is > acceptable (i grepped through the tree a bit and looked sane).
committed: http://sources.gentoo.org/eclass/user.eclass?r1=1.10&r2=1.11 -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.