On Wednesday 18 January 2012 13:40:23 Arfrever wrote:
> 2012-01-18 12:37:12 Mike Frysinger napisaƂ(a):
> > i agree that for some users, they've never heard of the the ARM NEON
> > extensions, but they have heard of the neon library.  i'd counter that
> > with a few points: (1) i don't think there are any packages in the tree
> > that have optional neon (the library) support
> 
> http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/genrdeps/rindex/net-libs/neon lists 6
> packages, which optionally depend on net-libs/neon.

fair enough.  some of those deps prob still wouldn't be USE=neon since they're 
webdev related, and others are xml related.

but too late now as the ship as sailed for everyone :).
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to