On Wednesday 18 January 2012 13:40:23 Arfrever wrote: > 2012-01-18 12:37:12 Mike Frysinger napisaĆ(a): > > i agree that for some users, they've never heard of the the ARM NEON > > extensions, but they have heard of the neon library. i'd counter that > > with a few points: (1) i don't think there are any packages in the tree > > that have optional neon (the library) support > > http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/genrdeps/rindex/net-libs/neon lists 6 > packages, which optionally depend on net-libs/neon.
fair enough. some of those deps prob still wouldn't be USE=neon since they're webdev related, and others are xml related. but too late now as the ship as sailed for everyone :). -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
