Zac Medico wrote: > On 01/21/2012 01:34 PM, Dale wrote: >> Michał Górny wrote: >>>> It's funny how I never needed one before either but now things are >>>> being broken. It's not LVM that is breaking it either. I wouldn't >>>> need the initramfs even if It was on a regular partition until the >>>> recent so called "improvements." >>> >>> ...and your main argument is 'long, long ago someone decided that it >>> should match the same taste as mine, so it should be like it forever'. >>> Of course, those times there were no such thing as an initramfs... >>> >> >> >> Then don't break that. Just because someone came up with a initramfs >> doesn't mean everyone should be forced to use one. > > The old way imposes requirements that are no longer supported by > upstream software. So, you basically have three choices: > > 1) Use old software that supports the old way > 2) Develop new software to support the old way > 3) Use an initramfs or pre-init script to mount /usr if it must be on > a separate partition
So the solution is to break things because things are broken. Sort of running in circles there. Pardon me, I'm dizzy. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! Miss the compile output? Hint: EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"
