Mike Frysinger posted on Sun, 29 Jan 2012 14:16:14 -0500 as excerpted: > On Sunday 29 January 2012 06:22:02 Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> epatch_user() currently looks into <CATEGORY>/<PF|P|PN> subdirectories >> of /etc/portage/patches. If the package has no revision, then PF and P >> are identical, so there's no way to specify that a patch should only >> apply to -r0. >> >> The patch below changes ${PF} to ${P}-${PR}. Behaviour should be >> identical for all non-zero revisions. For -r0 it will look in ${P}-r0 >> first, then in ${P} and ${PN}, as before. > > looks fine. gogogogogogogogo.
As a user with an epatch_user call in /etc/portage/bashrc, I've run into this problem myself a time or two, so yes, ++ here too. =:^) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman