El lun, 20-02-2012 a las 17:57 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió:
> On 02/20/2012 05:57 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
> > scarabeus    12/02/20 15:57:31
> >
> >    Modified:             libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild ChangeLog
> >    Log:
> >    Use single thread build as it is broken in paralel on some machines wrt 
> > bug#405029.
> >
> >    (Portage version: 2.2.0_alpha87/cvs/Linux x86_64)
> >
> > Revision  Changes    Path
> > 1.2                  dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild
> >
> > file : 
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild?rev=1.2&view=markup
> > plain: 
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild?rev=1.2&content-type=text/plain
> > diff : 
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild?r1=1.1&r2=1.2
> >
> > Index: libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: 
> > /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild,v
> > retrieving revision 1.1
> > retrieving revision 1.2
> > diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
> > --- libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild       20 Feb 2012 10:21:59 -0000      1.1
> > +++ libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild       20 Feb 2012 15:57:31 -0000      1.2
> > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> >   # Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation
> >   # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
> > -# $Header: 
> > /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild,v 1.1 
> > 2012/02/20 10:21:59 scarabeus Exp $
> > +# $Header: 
> > /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-db/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.7-r1.ebuild,v 1.2 
> > 2012/02/20 15:57:31 scarabeus Exp $
> >
> >   EAPI=4
> >
> > @@ -22,6 +22,8 @@
> >
> >   DOCS="AUTHORS ChangeLog NEWS README"
> >
> > +MAKEOPTS="-j1"
> > +
> 
> Why not use MAKEOPTS="${MAKEOPTS} -j1" to allow other make flags get 
> respected?
> 
> 
About this, I would also like to know if we are allowed to use "MAKEOPTS
+=..." (and the same for other variables in ebuild) instead or it should
be avoided for some reason.

Thanks for the info :)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to