El vie, 09-03-2012 a las 16:57 +0100, Michał Górny escribió: > On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:02:23 +0100 > Pacho Ramos <[email protected]> wrote: > > > El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:56 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > > > El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:51 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > > > > El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:47 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > > > > > Even if they have some people in their mail aliases, looks like > > > > > herds are empty. If nobody volunteers to join to them, I think > > > > > we should drop that herds and move their packages to > > > > > maintainer-needed in a week or so. > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > > > > The same applies to "sgml" now that cryos is retiring :( > > > > > > and text-markup, I think it's the last empty herd now > > > > Maybe we could do the same as did in the past for openoffice herd: > > - Change metadatas and bugs to assign them to maintainer-needed (and > > reflect reality) > > - Keep herd in metadatas and CCed them to bug reports > > > > The other option would be to simply drop that herds, assign packages > > to maintainer-needed and wait developers to grab whatever they want > > For net-zope, I'd prefer dropping it. We decided to get rid of Zope, > removed almost all relevant packages, so there's no point in keeping > the herd. >
OK but, what about the rest? ;)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
