On 2012-03-12 Mon 10:54, Nathan Phillip Brink wrote:
> > > # Samuli Suominen <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> (12 Mar 2012)
> > > # Severely broken wrt bugs #179178, #331181, #334835, #350059,
> > > # #372839, #380155, #380627, #381055, #383515, #383553, #384687,
> > > # and #403399. Search bugzilla with keyword lilypond. Nothing
> > > # left in tree that builds. Removal in 30 days.
> > > <media-sound/lilypond-2.12.4
> > > media-sound/denemo
> > > media-sound/frescobaldi
> > >
> > > # Samuli Suominen <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> (12 Mar 2012)
> > > # media-sound/lilypond required for this is masked in ../package.mask
> > > # for removal
> > > app-text/asciidoc test
> > >
> > Just curious, but is there no one interested in this, lilypond,
> > package anymore? The latest stable is 2.14.2 and the project is pretty
> > active. Seems like a shame to get rid of it entirely.

> I myself am quite interested in lilypond. I only use it occasionally
> and am still a novice at it, but I like the typesetting it does.

> Maybe next week I can find time to attack some of these bugs and
> rescue it, unless if someone more qualified or with more time is
> interested...

For those not following #gentoo-dev, I already said I'd take over
maintainership since I've been using it an overlay for years.

Anyone is free to help close bugs and co-maintain it if they wish.

Tim

Attachment: pgpnJL6RZXo86.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to