On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 22:47:23 +0200 Michał Górny <[email protected]> wrote: > > There's no guarantee, of course, that the amount of space in ${T} in > > pkg_pretend is anything like the amount of space that will be > > available for the build, but check-reqs is deliberately designed to > > be wildly inaccurate. > > Yes because being wildly accurate in this case is such a great > possibility here. Why don't you delight us with your vision of wildly > accurate space prediction, mister?
You should probably look at who wrote check-reqs in the first place, and why it was designed the way it was... You'll note in particular how the code just has a best attempt at finding a solution, and how it deliberately just gives a warning message, not a fatal error, if either it can't figure out whether a requirement is met or if it thinks that one isn't. You know, as if it were designed under the assumption that accuracy wouldn't be possible... Or you could just post more noise to the list in an attempt to stir up trouble. Your call. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
