El mar, 10-04-2012 a las 09:12 +0200, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." escribió: > On 4/10/12 8:58 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Other option would be to enable "wxwidgets" by default for that > > profiles. > > I prefer this. Changing USE flag meaning in a counter-intuitive way (to > let "gtk" mean "wxwidgets") would seem frustrating to me. > > With "wxwidgets" enabled by default people will get the most likely > desired result (i.e. GUI) "out of the box", and setting USE="-wxwidgets" > will have desired effect. > > Note that with USE="gtk" really meaning USE="wxwidgets", -wxwidgets > would have no effect on such a package, which is the potentially > surprising behavior I mentioned earlier. >
OK, looks like I misunderstood how wxwidgets work and most opinions point to enable wxwidgets by default in gnome profiles, ok with that solution?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
