On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:25:56 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 April 2012 00:15:45 Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:10:30 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Monday 23 April 2012 23:45:36 Doug Goldstein wrote:
> > > > So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for
> > > > allowing users to apply patches. And that's figuring out when
> > > > to run eautoreconf. I don't necessarily want to run it
> > > > unconditionally but sometimes users have patches which touch
> > > > autoconf files but my existing patch set doesn't so I'm not
> > > > calling eautoreconf. Does anyone have a suggested way to handle
> > > > this?
> > >
> > > just always call it when the user applies patches. i don't see a
> > > big deal. epatch_user && eautoreconf
> >
> > No configure.{ac,in} present!
>
> if the package doesn't have configure.{ac,in} files, then why would
> he be talking about eautoreconf ?
Ah, so we're talking per-package now. Sorry, thought it would be forced
everywhere.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
