On 04/27/2012 09:00 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:55:49 -0700 > Zac Medico <zmed...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> I suppose that we could do it both ways. The repoman check would be >> for people who want a practical approach that doesn't require all >> ebuilds to be converted to EAPI 5, and your strict die approach would >> be for people who want strictness and can afford to wait for the >> relevant ebuilds to be converted to EAPI 5. > > But there's no way the repoman check is going to give anything like > reliable answers if you're involving eclasses...
Okay, so people who need "reliable answers" can go with your strict approach. Meanwhile, it's relatively easy to to a manual audit of the src_prepare function of each eclass. -- Thanks, Zac
