On 16 May 2012 05:21, Walter Dnes <waltd...@waltdnes.org> wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:44:59AM +0200, Stelian Ionescu wrote >> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 18:38 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: >> > On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:26:03AM -0700, Greg KH wrote >> > > What specifically is your objection to udev today? Is it doing things >> > > you don't like? Too big? Something else? >> > >> > Today, it requires an initramfs if /usr is not physically on /. That >> > is due in large part to the fact that it has been rolled into the >> > systemd tarball, and inherited some of systemd's code and limitations, >> > despite the fact that udev is still a separate binary. >> >> This is absolutely and definitely false. Where did you hear such >> nonsense ? > > 1) Did you sleep through the /usr and initramfs flamewars? > http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/separate-usr-is-broken
You seem to have missed the bit that this has nothing at all to do with systemd. -- Arun Raghavan http://arunraghavan.net/ (Ford_Prefect | Gentoo) & (arunsr | GNOME)
