-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 05/23/2012 05:46 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 12:29:34 -0400 Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org>
> wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Samuli Suominen 
>> <ssuomi...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>> On 05/23/2012 05:36 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
>>>> One person doesn't do entries.  OMG let's remove it!
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> absolutely because inconsitency renderess the file useless
>>> 
>> 
>> Well, for now the solution is to enforce following policy.
>> 
>> For the future, perhaps the policy's time has ended.  Sure,
>> Changelogs can be handy, but they are increasingly redundant and
>> scm comments have the potential to be far more useful.  By all
>> means require meaningful scm commit comments, but if Changelog
>> files are holding us back either auto-generate them or ditch
>> them.
> 
> ChangeLogs could be fine for ebuilds. But for more broad cases
> like eclasses, one can usually have a set of changes prepared for
> commit. With CVS, it's PITA but with git it's already much better.
> Of course, it all fails if every commit has to update a randomly
> changed, shared file called ChangeLog...
> 

So we did we introduce changelogs for eclass/ in the first place if
everyone is happy with getting rid of them?

- -- 
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
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=/lXi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to