El dom, 10-06-2012 a las 13:25 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió: > On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 13:55:53 -0700 > Zac Medico <[email protected]> wrote: > > A dependency atom will have optional SLOT and ABI_SLOT parts. Using > > the dbus-glib depedency on glib:2 as an example [1], the dbus-glib > > dependency will be expressed with an atom such as dev-libs/glib:2:= > > and the package manager will translate that atom to > > dev-libs/glib:2:=2.32 at build time. So, ':' is always used to > > distinguish SLOT deps, and ':=' is always used to distinguish > > ABI_SLOT deps. Is that syntax good? > > Here's a nicer syntax: no ABI_SLOT variable, and SLOT="2/2.32". Then you > can do explicit :2/2.32 dependencies if you like, or :2 (which would > match SLOT="2" or SLOT="2/anything"), or :2= (which gets rewritten > to :2/2.32=) or :2*. If an ebuild does SLOT="2", it's treated as 2/2. >
Looks nice to me :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
