-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 14/06/12 07:58 PM, Peter Stuge wrote: > Samuli Suominen wrote: >> 9'ish consumers. I propose "Enable support for the PostScript >> language" > > Perhaps "ps" or "postscript" instead of the implementation-centric > "gs" ? > > > //Peter >
I think based on the consumers described we should keep the flag as 'gs' as this is primarily for ghostscript-based support and not generic postscript capability. That said, there's only nine of them, and as I can't see that many more packages suddenly including support for ghostscript I don't see that much of a need in making this flag be global...? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAk/bOAYACgkQ2ugaI38ACPC9OwD/W0ofi+chYYZ+k5ABo+VfODHs F/83jl30ru+iOakp/nkA/Rg+8H6wrNyR/1BAe78T2UfhgMEtGOQy16TA+UrmPrO6 =YpRu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
