On Friday 15 June 2012 12:54:16 Michał Górny wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 11:11:44 -0400 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On 06/15/12 09:32, Michał Górny wrote: > > > It is a little confusing when the function reports .a removal when > > > no such file exists. Also, explain why the file is removed. > > > > Why keep the "-f"? > > For rm? > > -f, --force > ignore nonexistent files and arguments, never prompt > > The second part is still valid.
i think his point was that since you just did a [[ -f ]] test, there shouldn't really be any cases where the rm would fail, so you could change the `rm -f` to `rm || die` ... -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
