Thomas Sachau posted on Sat, 16 Jun 2012 12:31:40 +0200 as excerpted:

> Since i am not that sure about my ability to write formal specs, i am
> presenting my first draft for further review and suggestions for
> improvement.

Just a format suggestion.  Call it nitpicky if you want, and yes, my 
client isn't perfect, but I'm sure people with a bit of experience 
writing such specs will tell you I'm not alone...

Several of your points ended up as very long single lines.  My client can 
wrap, but that wraps the points as well (so for example 2.1 starts in the 
middle of a line).  So I was left with the choice to either massively 
horizontally scroll, or of trying to figure out where one point ended and 
another began, since wrapping it... /wrapped/ it, so points appeared in 
the middle of a line.

Please:

* If you use long lines, leave a vertical space (blank line) between 
points so when a client wraps them, they wrap as individual paragraphs.

* Alternatively, wrap at something sensible. (The traditional wrap for 
posting is 72 chars or so, 80 minus a few to allow a few levels of 
quoting without rewrap.  I wouldn't complain at 90, but if you're going 
to bother, you might as well go the standard route and avoid further 
issues.)

Long lines as paragraphs would probably be easier especially early in the 
process when you're modifying a lot, but you still risk (even more) 
limited clients having issues with it.  YMMV.

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman


Reply via email to