On 3 July 2012 19:08, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 3 Jul 2012 15:44:04 +1200 > Kent Fredric <kentfred...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Firstly, we already have a ^^( ) syntax for REQUIRED_USE , "one of, >> but not more than one of". > > A user has a and b installed. c depends upon ^^ ( a b ). The user tries > to install c. What happens?
I'd expect that the user would have to remove one of ( a b ), the natural choice would be to remove b, a taking precedence. > -- > Ciaran McCreesh -- Kent perl -e "print substr( \"edrgmaM SPA NOcomil.ic\\@tfrken\", \$_ * 3, 3 ) for ( 9,8,0,7,1,6,5,4,3,2 );" http://kent-fredric.fox.geek.nz
