El dom, 08-07-2012 a las 22:59 +0200, René Neumann escribió: > Am 08.07.2012 22:10, schrieb Michał Górny: > > On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200 > > René Neumann <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of > >> base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e. > >> should each eclass make sure it imports and incorporates it. Or is it > >> just an eclass like the others and ebuilds should make sure they > >> inherit it if needed? > > > > No. It is unmaintained, has serious design flaws and it simply should > > not be used anywhere. At least in EAPI != [01]. > > > > Thanks for the clarification. As Mike already mentioned, one should > probably change the ebuild description to reflect just that fact. > (Because at the moment it just says the complete opposite.) > > - René >
And, if we are supposed to stop using it, it should print some kind of warning to remember developers to drop its usage
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
