The 13/07/12, William Hubbs wrote: > What about using devtmpfs alone?
It's quiet fine for very simple systems. -- Nicolas Sebrecht
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev <->... Rich Freeman
- [gentoo-dev] Re: udev <-> mde... Duncan
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev <->... Rich Freeman
- [gentoo-dev] Re: udev <-> mde... Duncan
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev <->... Michael Mol
- [gentoo-dev] Re: udev <-> mde... Duncan
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev <->... Peter Stuge
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev <->... Maxim Kammerer
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev <->... Ian Stakenvicius
- [gentoo-dev] Re: udev <-> mde... Duncan
- [gentoo-dev] Re: udev <-> mde... Nicolas Sebrecht
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev <->... Graham Murray
- [gentoo-dev] Re: udev <-> mde... Duncan
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev <->... Walter Dnes
- Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/libudev Michał Górny
- Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/libudev Rich Freeman
- Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/libudev Michał Górny
- Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/libudev Rich Freeman
- Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/libudev Thomas Sachau
- Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/libudev Mike Gilbert
- Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/libudev William Hubbs
