William Hubbs wrote: > > This is not quite correct. The initramfs is required because of [1]. > > > William >
Where is [1]? Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!
William Hubbs wrote: > > This is not quite correct. The initramfs is required because of [1]. > > > William >
Where is [1]? Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!